Sources of grounds for exclusion
:
Notice
Corruption
:
Does the tenderer themselves or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, hiring or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or hit fences in such bodies, by enforceable verdicts of wart convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down for no more than five years, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement as sub-debt? Corruption as defined in Article 3 in the convention on fighting corruption, involving tenest men in the European Communities or in the European Union's member states (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council say, framework fence 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on fighting corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also involves corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or the supplier.
Fraud
:
Does the tenderer themselves or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, hiring or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or hit fences in such bodies, by legally convicted warts convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down for no more than five years, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement as submerged debts? Fraud that was dealt with in Article 1 of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities' financial interests (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).
Money laundering or terrorist financing
:
Does the tenderer themselves or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, hiring or supervisory body, or have the competence to represent or control or hit fences in such bodies, at the legal verdict of wart convicted of whitewashing pengars or financing terrorism at a verdict handed down for no more than five years, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement that is indebted? Whitewashing of commuters or financing terrorism as defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and the Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on prevention measures against the use of the financial system for whitewashing pengars and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).
Participation in a criminal organisation
:
Does the tenderer themselves or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, hiring or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or hit fences in such bodies, by legally convicted vortte convicted of participating in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down for no more than five years sidan, or a rejection period set directly in judgement as being substantiated as the procured debt? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council say framework fence 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on the fighting for organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42)
Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities
:
Does the tenderer himself, or a person who is a member of the tenderer's administration, hiring or supervisory body, or who has the competence to represent or control or hit fences in such bodies, by legally convicted vortte of terrorist acts or criminal acts with liaison to terrorist activities at a verdict handed down for no more than five years. or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that is indebted? Acts of terrorism or criminal offences with binders for terrorist activities as defined in Articles 1 and 3 of the Council, stated framework fence 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on fighting terrorism (EFT L 164 af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also comprises incitement to, co-operation or attempts to do such actions as dealt with in Article 4 of the committee's framework fence.
Child labour and including other forms of trafficking in human beings
:
Does the tenderer themselves, or a person who is a member of the tenderer's administration, hiring or supervisory body, or have the competence to represent or control or hit fences in such bodies, by enforceable verdicts of wart convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking at a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement as indebted? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and the Council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and fighting of human trafficking and the protection of victims, and for compensation to the Council, say, framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1).
Breaching of obligations in the fields of environmental law
:
Is the tenderer able to have bridged reglane about environment as they stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement document or Article 18 (2) of directive 2014/24/EU.
Breaching of obligations in the fields of labour law
:
Is the tenderer able to have bridged reglane about working conditions as stated in the national law, the relevant notice or procurement document or Article 18 (2) in directive 2014/24/EU.
Breaching of obligations in the fields of social law
:
Is the tenderer able to have bridged reglane on social conditions as they stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement document or Article 18 (2) in Directive 2014/24/EU.
Agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition
:
Has the tenderer entered into an agreement/agreement with other suppliers with precautionary aims of turning the competition?
Grave professional misconduct
:
Has the supplier made serious mistakes in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement document.
Misrepresentation, withheld information, unable to provide required documents and
obtained confidential information of this procedure
:
Does the tenderer have: a) grossly incorrect information by sharing the information required to check that there is no basis for rejection. or of the qualification requirement being fulfilled, b) evaded to make such information, c) teke at once to present the support documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) with wrongly deterred the contracting authority ́s fence process in order to obtain confidential information that could make this an unrighteous advantage in connection with the fence process. the competition, or have misleading information that can have been easily moved into fences for rejection, selection or award?
Conflict of interest due to its participation in the procurement procedure
:
Is the tenderer aware of a conflict of interest as this is in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documentation?
Direct or indirect involvement in the preparation of this procurement procedure
:
Has the tenderer or a works subject connected to the tenderer coveted advice to the contracting authority or otherwise vore involved in planning the competition?
Early termination, damages, or other comparable sanctions
:
Has the tenderer made a suitable contract in connection with fulfilment of an early public contract, an early contract with an official contracting authority or an early concession contract, where the bridge has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions?
Breaching obligation relating to payment of social security contributions
:
Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?
Breaching obligation relating to payment of taxes
:
Do tenderers have evaded to fulfil their obligations to pay taxes and duties in the country in which he is established, and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is another country than what he is established in?
Business activities are suspended
:
What, under the committee, is it still capable of fulfilling the contract, with a view to the debting national driver and initiatives enabling the processing of business activities? It is not naudsynt to see to these information if the rejection of suppliers is made obligatory in accordance with the debting national law utan moglegheit for exceptions.
Bankruptcy
:
Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? If the tenderer, under the committee, is it able to carry out the contract, with a view to the debting national driver and initiatives ́s continued processing of the business activities? It is not naudsynt to see to these information if the rejection of suppliers is made obligatory in accordance with the debting national law utan moglegheit for exceptions.
Arrangement with creditors
:
Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? What, under the committee, is it still capable of fulfilling the contract, with a view to the debting national driver and initiatives enabling the processing of business activities? It is not naudsynt to see to these information if the rejection of suppliers is made obligatory in accordance with the debting national law utan moglegheit for exceptions.
Insolvency
:
Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? What, under the committee, is it able to carry out the contract, with a view to the debting national driver and initiatives connected to the business activities? It is not naudsynt to see to these information if rejection of suppliers is made obligatory in accordance with the debting national law utan moglegheit for exceptions.
Assets being administered by liquidator
:
What, under the committee, is it still capable of fulfilling the contract, with a view to the debting national driver and initiatives enabling the processing of business activities? It is not naudsynt to see to these information if the rejection of suppliers is made obligatory in accordance with the debting national law utan moglegheit for exceptions.
Analogous situation like bankruptcy, insolvency or arrangement with creditors under
national law
:
Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? If the tenderer, under the committee, is it able to carry out the contract, with a view to the debting national driver and initiatives enabling the processing of business activities? It is not naudsynt to obtain these information if the rejection of suppliers is made obligatory in accordance with the debting national law utan moglegheit for exceptions.