Sources of grounds for exclusion
:
Notice
Corruption
:
Has the supplier himself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or control body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted of corruption by a final judgment in a judgment handed down not more than five years ago, or a period of ineligibility set directly in the judgment that is still valid? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention against Corruption, involving officials of the European Communities or in The Member States of the European Union (OJ C 195 of 25.6.1997, p. 1), and in Article 2, paragraph 1, in the Council's framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This reason for rejection also includes corruption as defined in national law for the client or supplier.
Fraud
:
Has the supplier himself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or control body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, by a final judgment been convicted of fraud by a judgment handed down not more than five years ago, or a period of exclusion determined directly in the judgment that is still valid? Fraud as referred to in Article 1 of the Convention on the Protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).
Money laundering or terrorist financing
:
Has the supplier himself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or control body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment for money laundering or financing of terrorism by a judgment handed down no more than five years ago, or a period of ineligibility set directly in the judgment that is still valid? Money laundering or financing of terrorismAs defined in Article 1 of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2005/60/EC of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and the financing of terrorism (OJ L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).
Participation in a criminal organisation
:
Has the supplier himself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or control body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment for participation in a criminal organization by a judgment handed down no more than five years ago, or a period of disqualification stipulated directly in the judgment which is still valid? Participation in a criminal organization as defined in Article 2 of the Council's framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on combating organized crime (OJ L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42)
Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities
:
Has the supplier himself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administration, management or control body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment for terrorist acts or criminal offenses connected to terrorist activity by a sentence handed down no more than five years ago, or a period of disqualification stipulated directly in the sentence that still applies? Terrorist acts or criminal acts related to terrorist activity as defined in articles 1 and 3 of the Council's framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164 of 22.6.2002, p. 3). This reason for rejection also includes incitement to, complicity in or attempts to commit such acts as referred to in Article 4 of the aforementioned framework decision.
Child labour and including other forms of trafficking in human beings
:
Has the supplier himself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or control body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment for child labor and other forms of human trafficking in a judgment handed down no more than five years ago, or a period of ineligibility set directly in the judgment that is still valid? Child labor and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2011/36/EU of 5 April 2011 on the prevention and combating of human trafficking and the protection of its victims, and on the replacement of the Council's framework decision 2002/629/RIA (OJ L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1).
Breaching of obligations in the fields of environmental law
:
Is the supplier known to have committed a breach of provisions on the environment as they appear in national law, the relevant announcement or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Breaching of obligations in the fields of labour law
:
s the supplier known to have committed a breach of provisions on working conditions as they appear in national law, the relevant announcement or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Breaching of obligations in the fields of social law
:
Is the supplier known to have committed a breach of provisions on social conditions as they appear in national law, the relevant announcement or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition
:
Has the supplier entered into agreement(s) with other suppliers with the intention of distorting the competition?
Grave professional misconduct
:
Has the supplier committed serious errors in their professional practice? If relevant, see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents.
Misrepresentation, withheld information, unable to provide required documents and
obtained confidential information of this procedure
:
Has the supplier:a) provided grossly incorrect information when communicating the information required to check that there are no grounds for rejection, or that the qualification requirements have been met,b) failed to provide such information,c) made a reservation to immediately provide the supporting documents requested by the client, ord) unfairly influenced the client's decision-making process in order to acquire confidential information that could give the client an unfair advantage in connection with the competition, or has negligently provided misleading information that could have a significant influence on decisions about rejection, selection or award?
Conflict of interest due to its participation in the procurement procedure
:
Is the supplier aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant announcement or the procurement documents?
Direct or indirect involvement in the preparation of this procurement procedure
:
Has the supplier or a business associated with the supplier given advice to the client or otherwise been involved in the planning of the competition?
Early termination, damages, or other comparable sanctions
:
Has the supplier committed a significant breach of contract in connection with the fulfillment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public client or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the termination of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions?
Breaching of obligations set under purely national exclusion grounds
:
The client must indicate that in Norway there are national reasons for rejection. These must be described in the procurement documents. The supplier must answer whether he is in one or more of the situations described in the national reasons for rejection. Do the purely national grounds for rejection, set out in the relevant notice or in the procurement documents, apply?
Breaching obligation relating to payment of social security contributions
:
Has the supplier failed to fulfill all his obligations to pay social security contributions both in the country in which he is established, and in the client's Member State, if this is a different country than the one in which he is established?
Breaching obligation relating to payment of taxes
:
Has the supplier failed to fulfill his obligations to pay taxes and fees in the country in which he is established, and in the client's Member State, if this is a different country than the one in which he is established?
Bankruptcy
:
Is the supplier in a bankruptcy situation? State why, under the circumstances mentioned, you are nevertheless able to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national provisions and measures regarding the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to enter this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory according to the applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Arrangement with creditors
:
Is the supplier in a situation where he has been given a forced debt arrangement? State why, under the circumstances mentioned, you are nevertheless able to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national provisions and measures regarding the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to enter this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory according to the applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Insolvency
:
Is the supplier in an insolvency situation? State why, under the circumstances mentioned, you are nevertheless able to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national provisions and measures regarding the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to enter this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory according to the applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Assets being administered by liquidator
:
State why, under the circumstances mentioned, you are nevertheless able to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national provisions and measures regarding the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to enter this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory according to the applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Analogous situation like bankruptcy, insolvency or arrangement with creditors under
national law
:
Is the supplier in a situation where he has been given a forced debt arrangement? State why, under the circumstances mentioned, you are nevertheless able to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national provisions and measures regarding the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to enter this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory according to the applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.